A Model discourse (2018)

Fig 1. "Goldman, Alvin, and Thomas Blanchard. “Social Epistemology.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, 28 Apr. 2015, plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-social/." Photogrpah overlayed with quote and case study taken …

Fig 1. "Goldman, Alvin, and Thomas Blanchard. “Social Epistemology.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, 28 Apr. 2015, plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-social/." Photogrpah overlayed with quote and case study taken from the paper of soical epistemology. 

Fig 2. Installation of "A model discourse", original image as a poster, business cards, a banner and an accompanying audio track. 2018. 

Fig 2. Installation of "A model discourse", original image as a poster, business cards, a banner and an accompanying audio track. 2018. 

Fig 3. Installation of "A model discourse", original image as a poster, business cards, a banner and an accompanying audio track. 2018. 

Fig 3. Installation of "A model discourse", original image as a poster, business cards, a banner and an accompanying audio track. 2018. 

Fig 4. Installation of "A model discourse", original image as a poster, business cards, a banner and an accompanying audio track. 2018. 

Fig 4. Installation of "A model discourse", original image as a poster, business cards, a banner and an accompanying audio track. 2018. 

Fig 5. Buisness cards, a part of "A Model Discourse". 2018. 

Fig 5. Buisness cards, a part of "A Model Discourse". 2018. 

"A Model Discourse" (2018) explores the ideas presented in the Standard database paper on social epistemology, specifically in regards to the nature of conversation and how it deploys a regulated level of trust in order to maintain its function. In studying the way in which various social perceptions rise, it originates out of a nature of conversation and how the information is distributed. The format of the work models a form of anti-propaganda propaganda, which advertises a questioning of even the most basic dialogues. Even the work itself occupies a space of distrust in the volume of a unified message and the uncanniness of the mannequin heads. The business cards ,attached with the bibliogrpahy which ties to a free database for learning, extends the work and its potential reach outside of the academic gallery space and it eliitism.